Congress has been so low in the polls it doesn't know which way
is up. But scandals in recent years by individual lawmakers (mainly
GOP) have forced a new Congress (mainly Democratic) to try to climb
out
of its pit of pitiful perfidy and reform its backroom M.O. That is, up
to a point.
The Senate takes up a House-passed bill Thursday that will go
far to curb the influence of big money and special-interest lobbies in
shaping new laws and spending priorities. Political resistance to
these
landmark reforms still remains strong in the Senate because of a false
sense of privilege and immunity. But rising public disgust -
rather than apathy - at such arrogance should help pass this
major change in how the people's business is conducted on Capitol
Hill.
It also helps that a number of legislators are still under
official investigation, with Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, being the
latest. (His home was raided by the FBI on Monday.)
Among other things, the House bill opens a new window on the
practice of lobbyists who "bundle" small donations into large cash
for
lawmakers' campaign coffers. That loophole in the campaign-finance
laws
should be closed up entirely. This bill wouldn't do that, but at least
it would help reveal, to some degree, the corrupting link between
money
and legislation.
The reform was watered down by lawmakers who fear for their
incumbency. Such bundling would be reported every six months, rather
than every three, and only in amounts more than $15,000, rather than
$5,000. Go figure.
Another worthy halfstep toward cleaning up Congress is a
provision to shine light on the age-old practice of lawmakers slipping
special measures into legislation for pet projects. These "earmarks"
are often hidden or last-minute.
The House already has toughened its rules on earmarks, opening
them up to debate. The Senate negotiators, however, faltered, and the
bill now allows the majority leader, not the neutral parliamentarian,
to disclose earmarks. And revealing them on a database for the public
to see will be done only if "technically feasible."
Such limits would still allow many earmarks to be kept hidden.
And the measure also does not require lawmakers to reveal earmarks
that
would benefit themselves or their families.
Another reform would end the practice of a single senator being
able to secretly put a "hold" on almost any action. Many federal
appointments have been delayed or blocked because of this concealed
power. The bill also strikes a limited blow at the "revolving door"
of
former lawmakers cashing in on their influence by becoming lobbyists.
All these steps, while not exactly what they might have been,
will help restore some public faith in American democracy, reduce
wasteful spending, and speed up the process of legislating. They also
may reduce the power of incumbents in Congress, especially the ability
to collect more campaign money than new political opponents.
The Senate should not balk at this bill, which was largely
shepherded to this point by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Voters need
more than the ballot box to punish lawmakers who bend to money and
power. They need to see tougher rules on ethics that let Congress also
punish its own.